<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 668 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394761</link>
    <description>The appellate authority rejected the appeal, affirming that the appellant&#039;s transport services are subject to GST. The authority held that the absence of consignment notes does not exempt the services from GST, as they fall under the definition of a Goods Transport Agency. Additionally, the authority confirmed the applicability of Rule 42 of the CGST Rules 2017 for apportioning Input Tax Credit between taxable and non-taxable supplies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 668 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394761</link>
      <description>The appellate authority rejected the appeal, affirming that the appellant&#039;s transport services are subject to GST. The authority held that the absence of consignment notes does not exempt the services from GST, as they fall under the definition of a Goods Transport Agency. Additionally, the authority confirmed the applicability of Rule 42 of the CGST Rules 2017 for apportioning Input Tax Credit between taxable and non-taxable supplies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>