<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 667 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394760</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the decision that the transportation services provided by the Appellant were part of a composite works contract and taxable at 18%. The exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 was deemed inapplicable, and the contracts were considered as a single indivisible contract for the supply of goods and services, resulting in immovable property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 667 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394760</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the decision that the transportation services provided by the Appellant were part of a composite works contract and taxable at 18%. The exemption under Notification No. 12/2017 was deemed inapplicable, and the contracts were considered as a single indivisible contract for the supply of goods and services, resulting in immovable property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>