https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287628 Addresses whether Houses may expel members under parliamentary privileges and the scope of judicial review. Majority analysis treats expulsion as a disciplinary power exercisable by the Houses where adequate relevant material exists, and holds judicial review is limitedcourts will not reappraise legislative assessments so long as procedure was not illegal, arbitrary or violative of Articles 14, 20 or 21; principles of natural justice are flexible and reasonable opportunity sufficed; raw video footage may constitute corroborative evidence. A concurrent opinion concluded Article 105(3) does not authorize expulsion and that expulsion would require constitutional amendment or statutory provision, thus challenging the validity of expulsions. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jan 2026 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287628 Addresses whether Houses may expel members under parliamentary privileges and the scope of judicial review. Majority analysis treats expulsion as a disciplinary power exercisable by the Houses where adequate relevant material exists, and holds judicial review is limitedcourts will not reappraise legislative assessments so long as procedure was not illegal, arbitrary or violative of Articles 14, 20 or 21; principles of natural justice are flexible and reasonable opportunity sufficed; raw video footage may constitute corroborative evidence. A concurrent opinion concluded Article 105(3) does not authorize expulsion and that expulsion would require constitutional amendment or statutory provision, thus challenging the validity of expulsions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287628