<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 648 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the order passed by the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax invoking section 263 was not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had correctly treated the subsidy received by the assessee as revenue in nature, with no loss to the revenue. As a result, the revision order was deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 648 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the order passed by the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax invoking section 263 was not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer had correctly treated the subsidy received by the assessee as revenue in nature, with no loss to the revenue. As a result, the revision order was deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>