https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394738 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal, ruling that royalty charges should not be included in the transaction value as per the invoice sale value under Rule 10(c) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. This decision overturned the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs GATT Valuation Cell, Mumbai, and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)-Mumbai-I. The Department did not further appeal, accepting the Tribunal's decision. The judgment was pronounced on 28.01.2020, settling the issue in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394738 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal, ruling that royalty charges should not be included in the transaction value as per the invoice sale value under Rule 10(c) of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. This decision overturned the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Customs GATT Valuation Cell, Mumbai, and the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)-Mumbai-I. The Department did not further appeal, accepting the Tribunal's decision. The judgment was pronounced on 28.01.2020, settling the issue in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394738