<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 637 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394730</link>
    <description>The Writ Petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order of assessment, with no costs imposed. The court emphasized the importance of considering uncontroverted facts presented by the assessee and criticized the lack of examination of facts or application of mind by the Assessing Authority in the original assessment. The connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed as a result of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 637 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394730</link>
      <description>The Writ Petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned order of assessment, with no costs imposed. The court emphasized the importance of considering uncontroverted facts presented by the assessee and criticized the lack of examination of facts or application of mind by the Assessing Authority in the original assessment. The connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed as a result of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>