<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 636 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394729</link>
    <description>Judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited to recognised infirmities such as lack of competence, procedural illegality, breach of natural justice, extraneous considerations, perversity or absence of evidence, and the court will not re-appreciate evidence merely because another view is possible. On the facts discussed, participation in the enquiry and opportunity to cross-examine defeated any challenge to the findings, so the departmental guilt finding was not disturbed. Punishment may still be reviewed where it is so disproportionate that it shocks the judicial conscience, and lesser statutory penalties, service record and the nature of misconduct remain relevant. The dismissal was therefore set aside on penalty and remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 636 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394729</link>
      <description>Judicial review in disciplinary matters is limited to recognised infirmities such as lack of competence, procedural illegality, breach of natural justice, extraneous considerations, perversity or absence of evidence, and the court will not re-appreciate evidence merely because another view is possible. On the facts discussed, participation in the enquiry and opportunity to cross-examine defeated any challenge to the findings, so the departmental guilt finding was not disturbed. Punishment may still be reviewed where it is so disproportionate that it shocks the judicial conscience, and lesser statutory penalties, service record and the nature of misconduct remain relevant. The dismissal was therefore set aside on penalty and remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>