<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1293 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287627</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed an appeal against HC&#039;s refusal to condone 916 days delay in filing LPA. The appellant challenged construction of group housing society on land originally owned by Ministry of Defence, claiming violation of MPD 2021. The SC held that while liberal approach is taken for condonation of delay, routine explanations are insufficient for such inordinate delay. The appellant&#039;s explanations regarding Vice Chancellor&#039;s retirement and Executive Council deliberations were unconvincing. Given that land conversion occurred in 2005 and public auction in 2008, combined with DMRC receiving Rs. 218.20 crores for metro projects, condoning delay would be contrary to public interest and affect accrued rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1293 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287627</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed an appeal against HC&#039;s refusal to condone 916 days delay in filing LPA. The appellant challenged construction of group housing society on land originally owned by Ministry of Defence, claiming violation of MPD 2021. The SC held that while liberal approach is taken for condonation of delay, routine explanations are insufficient for such inordinate delay. The appellant&#039;s explanations regarding Vice Chancellor&#039;s retirement and Executive Council deliberations were unconvincing. Given that land conversion occurred in 2005 and public auction in 2008, combined with DMRC receiving Rs. 218.20 crores for metro projects, condoning delay would be contrary to public interest and affect accrued rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>