https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287620 The appeals contested the denial of credit on various services under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal modified the impugned OIA, allowing credit for services deemed 'Input Service' in cited judgments. However, the matter of credit on GTA Service was remanded to the adjudicating authority to determine the place of removal. The appeals were disposed of in accordance with these findings, as pronounced by the Member (Judicial). en-us Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287620 The appeals contested the denial of credit on various services under Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The Tribunal modified the impugned OIA, allowing credit for services deemed 'Input Service' in cited judgments. However, the matter of credit on GTA Service was remanded to the adjudicating authority to determine the place of removal. The appeals were disposed of in accordance with these findings, as pronounced by the Member (Judicial). Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287620