<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 649 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287619</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Bar Council of India&#039;s order holding the appellant guilty of misconduct. The Court found that the evidence did not support the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt and that the Disciplinary Committee&#039;s findings resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The appeal and Special Leave Petition were disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:55:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 649 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287619</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Bar Council of India&#039;s order holding the appellant guilty of misconduct. The Court found that the evidence did not support the allegations beyond a reasonable doubt and that the Disciplinary Committee&#039;s findings resulted in a miscarriage of justice. The appeal and Special Leave Petition were disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>