https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287616 The Supreme Court held that the Magistrate has jurisdiction to authorize detention of an accused after the charge-sheet submission but before the commitment to Sessions Court. The Court clarified that this period constitutes an inquiry during which the Magistrate can remand the accused to custody under Section 309(2) of the CrPC. The High Court's direction for bail was set aside as the Magistrate's authority to remand was affirmed. The Court emphasized compliance with procedural requirements before committing the accused to Sessions Court. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:33:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287616 The Supreme Court held that the Magistrate has jurisdiction to authorize detention of an accused after the charge-sheet submission but before the commitment to Sessions Court. The Court clarified that this period constitutes an inquiry during which the Magistrate can remand the accused to custody under Section 309(2) of the CrPC. The High Court's direction for bail was set aside as the Magistrate's authority to remand was affirmed. The Court emphasized compliance with procedural requirements before committing the accused to Sessions Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287616