https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287613 An advocate was found to have retained and continued business interests after enrolment, and the concurrent disciplinary findings of professional misconduct were upheld because they were supported by cogent evidence, including documentary material and witness testimony. The claimed oral arrangement that family members were running the businesses was not established. Although the misconduct finding stood, the punishment of permanent debarment from practice was considered unduly severe in the circumstances, including the advocate's handicap, and was moderated to a bar on practice until the end of December 2006. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:15:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287613 An advocate was found to have retained and continued business interests after enrolment, and the concurrent disciplinary findings of professional misconduct were upheld because they were supported by cogent evidence, including documentary material and witness testimony. The claimed oral arrangement that family members were running the businesses was not established. Although the misconduct finding stood, the punishment of permanent debarment from practice was considered unduly severe in the circumstances, including the advocate's handicap, and was moderated to a bar on practice until the end of December 2006. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287613