https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287613 The appellant's appeal against removal from the State's Roll of Advocates for professional misconduct was upheld due to engaging in business activities post-enrolment. False declarations during enrolment process and evidence of ongoing business activities led to findings of misconduct. Despite defense claims, the appellant's involvement in various businesses was established. Disciplinary Committees found the appellant guilty, resulting in debarring from practice. The Court modified the punishment to debarment until December 2006, citing appellant's handicap. The original finding of misconduct remained unchanged, with the appeal disposed of without costs. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:15:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287613 The appellant's appeal against removal from the State's Roll of Advocates for professional misconduct was upheld due to engaging in business activities post-enrolment. False declarations during enrolment process and evidence of ongoing business activities led to findings of misconduct. Despite defense claims, the appellant's involvement in various businesses was established. Disciplinary Committees found the appellant guilty, resulting in debarring from practice. The Court modified the punishment to debarment until December 2006, citing appellant's handicap. The original finding of misconduct remained unchanged, with the appeal disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287613