https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287611 Section 3 of the Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1965 was upheld as a valid special recovery mechanism for State advances made for public developmental purposes. The classification between the State and ordinary private creditors was found to rest on a real and intelligible differentia, because expedited recovery of public funds serves the legislative objective of enabling fresh advances for industrial and welfare activities. The availability of a civil suit did not invalidate the special procedure, and the absence of express statutory guidelines was not sufficient to show arbitrary power or hostile discrimination. The Court held that the Act's object and scheme supplied adequate guidance and that the procedure was reasonably related to its purpose. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:27:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287611 Section 3 of the Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1965 was upheld as a valid special recovery mechanism for State advances made for public developmental purposes. The classification between the State and ordinary private creditors was found to rest on a real and intelligible differentia, because expedited recovery of public funds serves the legislative objective of enabling fresh advances for industrial and welfare activities. The availability of a civil suit did not invalidate the special procedure, and the absence of express statutory guidelines was not sufficient to show arbitrary power or hostile discrimination. The Court held that the Act's object and scheme supplied adequate guidance and that the procedure was reasonably related to its purpose. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287611