https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287611 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1965, stating it does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Act's provision for a speedier recovery process for State loans was deemed reasonable and essential for public welfare programs. The Court clarified the competence of revenue authorities to recover dues as arrears of land revenue under the Act, emphasizing the need for expeditious recovery of public funds. Additionally, the Court addressed concerns of arbitrary power under the Act, highlighting the inherent guidance for authorized officers in utilizing the Act's provisions. en-us Wed, 06 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:27:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287611 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1965, stating it does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The Act's provision for a speedier recovery process for State loans was deemed reasonable and essential for public welfare programs. The Court clarified the competence of revenue authorities to recover dues as arrears of land revenue under the Act, emphasizing the need for expeditious recovery of public funds. Additionally, the Court addressed concerns of arbitrary power under the Act, highlighting the inherent guidance for authorized officers in utilizing the Act's provisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287611