<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 978 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287608</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the criminal proceedings against the appellant were quashed, as the cognizance taken without the required sanction was deemed an abuse of the process of the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 978 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287608</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the criminal proceedings against the appellant were quashed, as the cognizance taken without the required sanction was deemed an abuse of the process of the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>