https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287607 An order restoring possession to a landlord for demolition or reconstruction under Section 12 does not extinguish the tenancy; the tenant re-enters under the original tenancy, not on fresh terms, and the landlord cannot insist on higher rent as a condition for restoration, though fair rent may be revised through the statutory remedy. An application by the tenant to enforce the landlord's undertaking for restoration is not governed by the execution rule for the landlord's decree; in the absence of a specific period, Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies. The restoration claim was therefore treated as within limitation. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2020 14:47:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287607 An order restoring possession to a landlord for demolition or reconstruction under Section 12 does not extinguish the tenancy; the tenant re-enters under the original tenancy, not on fresh terms, and the landlord cannot insist on higher rent as a condition for restoration, though fair rent may be revised through the statutory remedy. An application by the tenant to enforce the landlord's undertaking for restoration is not governed by the execution rule for the landlord's decree; in the absence of a specific period, Article 137 of the Limitation Act applies. The restoration claim was therefore treated as within limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287607