https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394723 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the eligibility criteria in a tender notification set by Respondent-CSMCL. The Court found the criteria reasonable and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of favoritism or malafide intent. It concluded that the decision-making process was transparent and based on valid reasons, such as past financial losses and compliance with tax regulations. Additionally, the Court noted that the timing of the tender notification did not limit participation, as new firms, including those from outside the state, participated. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394723 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the eligibility criteria in a tender notification set by Respondent-CSMCL. The Court found the criteria reasonable and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of favoritism or malafide intent. It concluded that the decision-making process was transparent and based on valid reasons, such as past financial losses and compliance with tax regulations. Additionally, the Court noted that the timing of the tender notification did not limit participation, as new firms, including those from outside the state, participated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394723