<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 618 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee by deleting the additions of Rs. 2,00,29,039 and Rs. 73,13,300 due to lesser deduction on account of the fair market value of land and unexplained investment in property, respectively. However, the denial of deduction under section 54B of the Income Tax Act was upheld. The decision was announced on 11.02.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 618 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee by deleting the additions of Rs. 2,00,29,039 and Rs. 73,13,300 due to lesser deduction on account of the fair market value of land and unexplained investment in property, respectively. However, the denial of deduction under section 54B of the Income Tax Act was upheld. The decision was announced on 11.02.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>