https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287606 A cinema licensing condition that empowered the Government to require exhibition of approved films for an indefinite length or duration, without any fixed maximum or guiding limitation, was treated as an unreasonable restriction on the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). The Court reasoned that such unfettered discretion could consume the whole or major part of the performance and was therefore harsh in operation rather than a reasonable regulatory measure. Because the conditions were not confined to films of educational or instructional character for public welfare, the challenged clauses were struck down as void and unconstitutional. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:11:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287606 A cinema licensing condition that empowered the Government to require exhibition of approved films for an indefinite length or duration, without any fixed maximum or guiding limitation, was treated as an unreasonable restriction on the right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g). The Court reasoned that such unfettered discretion could consume the whole or major part of the performance and was therefore harsh in operation rather than a reasonable regulatory measure. Because the conditions were not confined to films of educational or instructional character for public welfare, the challenged clauses were struck down as void and unconstitutional. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Oct 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287606