<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 611 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394704</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the depreciation claim of Rs. 36,40,145. The ITAT found the issue was covered in favor of the assessee by previous orders, with no distinguishing facts presented to warrant a different view. The ITAT referred to a previous order in the assessee&#039;s own case and decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 611 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394704</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the depreciation claim of Rs. 36,40,145. The ITAT found the issue was covered in favor of the assessee by previous orders, with no distinguishing facts presented to warrant a different view. The ITAT referred to a previous order in the assessee&#039;s own case and decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>