<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 609 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394702</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of higher depreciation on the Concrete Pump and related equipment but allowing the higher rate for the &#039;Chassis.&#039; The decision was based on the distinction between integral vehicle components and additional equipment added for business purposes, emphasizing the importance of correctly assessing depreciation rates in accordance with the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 609 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394702</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the disallowance of higher depreciation on the Concrete Pump and related equipment but allowing the higher rate for the &#039;Chassis.&#039; The decision was based on the distinction between integral vehicle components and additional equipment added for business purposes, emphasizing the importance of correctly assessing depreciation rates in accordance with the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>