https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287599 Section 12 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 was held to empower the Custodian to cancel a lease granted by himself, because the retrospective Explanation inserted in 1954 deemed "lease" to include a lease created by the Custodian and operated as if always part of the section. The non obstante clause did not narrow that substantive power, and the authority to cancel or vary the lease was treated as unqualified. A separate objection that the notice was invalid as to the agreement to sell was not decided and was left open. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:30:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287599 Section 12 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 was held to empower the Custodian to cancel a lease granted by himself, because the retrospective Explanation inserted in 1954 deemed "lease" to include a lease created by the Custodian and operated as if always part of the section. The non obstante clause did not narrow that substantive power, and the authority to cancel or vary the lease was treated as unqualified. A separate objection that the notice was invalid as to the agreement to sell was not decided and was left open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287599