<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394678</link>
    <description>The ITAT classified the rental income as &#039;Income from House Property&#039; due to a change in government policy. However, concerns were raised about potential double benefits claimed by the assessee. The case was remitted back to the AO for verification of asset details to prevent any undue tax benefits. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for re-examination by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 585 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394678</link>
      <description>The ITAT classified the rental income as &#039;Income from House Property&#039; due to a change in government policy. However, concerns were raised about potential double benefits claimed by the assessee. The case was remitted back to the AO for verification of asset details to prevent any undue tax benefits. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, with directions for re-examination by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>