<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 579 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394672</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting several issues back to the AO for fresh examination. The tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 82,14,500 under Section 69A, as the source of the money was satisfactorily explained. Other issues such as the non-taxability of Director&#039;s fees and disallowance of expenses were remitted for further examination and verification by the AO. The tribunal directed the AO to verify a tax payment of Rs. 3,74,099 claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 579 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394672</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remitting several issues back to the AO for fresh examination. The tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 82,14,500 under Section 69A, as the source of the money was satisfactorily explained. Other issues such as the non-taxability of Director&#039;s fees and disallowance of expenses were remitted for further examination and verification by the AO. The tribunal directed the AO to verify a tax payment of Rs. 3,74,099 claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>