<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1830 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287592</link>
    <description>Regular bail was refused in proceedings concerning alleged offences under the CGST Act, where the allegations involved creation of fake firms and fake entries to avail input tax credit. The plea of false implication was not accepted, and the dismissal of bail applications of co-accused was treated as a relevant factor against release. On those facts, no ground was found to enlarge the petitioner on bail, and the request for regular bail was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1830 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287592</link>
      <description>Regular bail was refused in proceedings concerning alleged offences under the CGST Act, where the allegations involved creation of fake firms and fake entries to avail input tax credit. The plea of false implication was not accepted, and the dismissal of bail applications of co-accused was treated as a relevant factor against release. On those facts, no ground was found to enlarge the petitioner on bail, and the request for regular bail was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>