<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (10) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287583</link>
    <description>Motor vehicle rules made during Governor&#039;s Rule were held to continue in force after the proclamation ended and after the Constitution commenced, because existing laws were preserved by the constitutional saving provisions. The statutory requirement that the rules be laid before the Legislature was treated as directory, since the Act did not make non-laying a condition for validity. The delegation allowing the Regional Transport Authority to act through its Secretary was upheld as a valid administrative arrangement within the legislative framework. A permit-renewal condition requiring payment of motor vehicle tax was found to be within competence on pith and substance, as it regulated transport operations and only incidentally affected taxation. The condition was also held to be a reasonable restriction on business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (10) TMI 45 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287583</link>
      <description>Motor vehicle rules made during Governor&#039;s Rule were held to continue in force after the proclamation ended and after the Constitution commenced, because existing laws were preserved by the constitutional saving provisions. The statutory requirement that the rules be laid before the Legislature was treated as directory, since the Act did not make non-laying a condition for validity. The delegation allowing the Regional Transport Authority to act through its Secretary was upheld as a valid administrative arrangement within the legislative framework. A permit-renewal condition requiring payment of motor vehicle tax was found to be within competence on pith and substance, as it regulated transport operations and only incidentally affected taxation. The condition was also held to be a reasonable restriction on business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>