https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394661 The Authority found that the Respondent violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction to customers. The profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 7,33,043/-. The Respondent was directed to reduce prices accordingly and deposit the profiteered amount in the Consumer Welfare Funds of the Central and State Government of Maharashtra. The SGST Commissioner was tasked with submitting a compliance report within four months. en-us Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:06:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394661 The Authority found that the Respondent violated Section 171(1) of the CGST Act by not passing on the benefit of the GST rate reduction to customers. The profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 7,33,043/-. The Respondent was directed to reduce prices accordingly and deposit the profiteered amount in the Consumer Welfare Funds of the Central and State Government of Maharashtra. The SGST Commissioner was tasked with submitting a compliance report within four months. Case-Laws GST Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394661