<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1306 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by adjusting the disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) in the assessment for the relevant year. Specifically, the Tribunal increased the agricultural income claim to 75% of the claimed amount, upheld the addition of a cash deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs, affirmed the addition of a differential cash deposit of Rs. 66,520, and upheld the disallowance of interest payments totaling Rs. 10,42,947.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1306 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal by adjusting the disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) in the assessment for the relevant year. Specifically, the Tribunal increased the agricultural income claim to 75% of the claimed amount, upheld the addition of a cash deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs, affirmed the addition of a differential cash deposit of Rs. 66,520, and upheld the disallowance of interest payments totaling Rs. 10,42,947.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>