https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287576 The Supreme Court allowed interlocutory applications for intervention in the case, directing petitioners to deposit money before the Registry. Consumers had varying preferences for possession of flats or refunds, with the court emphasizing clear communication. Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal was appointed as Amicus Curiae to oversee the case, compile project details, and determine refund amounts. The matter was scheduled for further proceedings on 15th September 2017, with a focus on consumer choices and directions for communication with the Amicus Curiae. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:22:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287576 The Supreme Court allowed interlocutory applications for intervention in the case, directing petitioners to deposit money before the Registry. Consumers had varying preferences for possession of flats or refunds, with the court emphasizing clear communication. Mr. Pawan Shree Agarwal was appointed as Amicus Curiae to oversee the case, compile project details, and determine refund amounts. The matter was scheduled for further proceedings on 15th September 2017, with a focus on consumer choices and directions for communication with the Amicus Curiae. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287576