https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287562 The High Court of Bombay set aside the arbitration award under Rule 13 due to an error of law on the face of the award. The Court emphasized the necessity of clearly identifiable legal propositions within arbitration awards and reiterated that the arbitrator's jurisdiction is determined by the reference clause in the contract. The judgment underscored the importance of distinguishing between narrative references and explicitly stated legal propositions in arbitration awards. en-us Tue, 06 Mar 1923 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2020 17:06:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287562 The High Court of Bombay set aside the arbitration award under Rule 13 due to an error of law on the face of the award. The Court emphasized the necessity of clearly identifiable legal propositions within arbitration awards and reiterated that the arbitrator's jurisdiction is determined by the reference clause in the contract. The judgment underscored the importance of distinguishing between narrative references and explicitly stated legal propositions in arbitration awards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Mar 1923 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287562