https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287560 An administrative takeover order appointing an Authorised Controller under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act was valid where the Government recorded reasons showing application of mind to inspection and audit material, including alleged misappropriation, non-accounting of collections, and mismanagement of institutional property. The statutory scheme required notice, consideration of the management's explanation, and satisfaction of the prescribed grounds before action was taken, and those requirements were met on the record. The Supreme Court also stated that in writ review the High Court could not reappreciate the factual satisfaction of the authorities or sit in appeal over the administrative decision. The challenge therefore failed and the takeover was sustained. en-us Sat, 06 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:38:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287560 An administrative takeover order appointing an Authorised Controller under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act was valid where the Government recorded reasons showing application of mind to inspection and audit material, including alleged misappropriation, non-accounting of collections, and mismanagement of institutional property. The statutory scheme required notice, consideration of the management's explanation, and satisfaction of the prescribed grounds before action was taken, and those requirements were met on the record. The Supreme Court also stated that in writ review the High Court could not reappreciate the factual satisfaction of the authorities or sit in appeal over the administrative decision. The challenge therefore failed and the takeover was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 06 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287560