<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 541 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394634</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, addressing the issues of reopening of assessment, disallowance of packaging material purchases, burden of proof, substantiation of purchases, percentage of disallowance, and consistency in business operations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing documentation to support expenses and the assessee&#039;s duty to establish the legitimacy of transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 541 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394634</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed both appeals filed by the assessee, addressing the issues of reopening of assessment, disallowance of packaging material purchases, burden of proof, substantiation of purchases, percentage of disallowance, and consistency in business operations. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of providing documentation to support expenses and the assessee&#039;s duty to establish the legitimacy of transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>