<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 536 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394629</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur Bench directed the assessee to deposit an additional sum to stay the balance demand pending appeal, with the Department prohibited from taking coercive actions. The matter was set for a hearing, requiring the assessee to comply with specific instructions to avoid adjournment. The stay application was resolved based on these directives issued in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 536 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394629</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur Bench directed the assessee to deposit an additional sum to stay the balance demand pending appeal, with the Department prohibited from taking coercive actions. The matter was set for a hearing, requiring the assessee to comply with specific instructions to avoid adjournment. The stay application was resolved based on these directives issued in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>