<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 524 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394617</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income. The penalty was deemed invalid as it was imposed without specifying the limb and based on estimated additions, which the Tribunal emphasized should not attract penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 19:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 524 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394617</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) for alleged concealment of income. The penalty was deemed invalid as it was imposed without specifying the limb and based on estimated additions, which the Tribunal emphasized should not attract penalties. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>