<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 522 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all assessment years, concluding that the AO and CIT(A) did not correctly interpret the nature of the transactions and the applicable legal principles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the substance over the form of transactions, especially in the context of quasi-equity and shareholder functions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:52:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 522 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all assessment years, concluding that the AO and CIT(A) did not correctly interpret the nature of the transactions and the applicable legal principles. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the substance over the form of transactions, especially in the context of quasi-equity and shareholder functions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>