https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22061 The statutory bar in section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 prevents a real owner from asserting benami claims against an ostensible owner, but it does not stop a third party from contending that the apparent transferee is only a benamidar. Read with sections 22 and 23 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act and the analogous protective provisions in Regulation 2 of 1956, the competent land reform authority may examine the true character of the transfer to determine whether it is hit by the statutory prohibition. The revisional authority's contrary view was held erroneous, and the matter was remanded for findings on the sale deed and further action according to law. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22061 The statutory bar in section 4 of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 prevents a real owner from asserting benami claims against an ostensible owner, but it does not stop a third party from contending that the apparent transferee is only a benamidar. Read with sections 22 and 23 of the Orissa Land Reforms Act and the analogous protective provisions in Regulation 2 of 1956, the competent land reform authority may examine the true character of the transfer to determine whether it is hit by the statutory prohibition. The revisional authority's contrary view was held erroneous, and the matter was remanded for findings on the sale deed and further action according to law. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 19 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22061