https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287555 The Court disposed of the matters largely by accepting withdrawal of the appeals and writ petitions after counsel stated that representations would be made to BIFR, while preserving the right to have those representations considered. It discharged the interim status quo order on possession but continued it for eight weeks, allowing the parties to seek positive relief and to pursue proceedings under Section 10 of the U.P. Sugar Industry Undertakings Act, as well as other available civil remedies. One appeal was dismissed as infructuous, and disputes concerning bank payments and deposits were left to pending civil suits. en-us Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:36:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287555 The Court disposed of the matters largely by accepting withdrawal of the appeals and writ petitions after counsel stated that representations would be made to BIFR, while preserving the right to have those representations considered. It discharged the interim status quo order on possession but continued it for eight weeks, allowing the parties to seek positive relief and to pursue proceedings under Section 10 of the U.P. Sugar Industry Undertakings Act, as well as other available civil remedies. One appeal was dismissed as infructuous, and disputes concerning bank payments and deposits were left to pending civil suits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287555