<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 560 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287555</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 and allowed appellants to make a representation to the BIFR for consideration of their cases, resulting in the dismissal of appeals and Writ Petitions without deciding on the merits. The Court maintained the status quo regarding possession of a property occupied by the Director of the appellant company until the case&#039;s disposal. The appeals and Writ Petitions were dismissed as withdrawn, with parties permitted to seek positive directions regarding possession through legal procedures. Specific directions were provided for the realization of dues, and parties were allowed to pursue their rights through ongoing civil suits as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 560 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287555</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971 and allowed appellants to make a representation to the BIFR for consideration of their cases, resulting in the dismissal of appeals and Writ Petitions without deciding on the merits. The Court maintained the status quo regarding possession of a property occupied by the Director of the appellant company until the case&#039;s disposal. The appeals and Writ Petitions were dismissed as withdrawn, with parties permitted to seek positive directions regarding possession through legal procedures. Specific directions were provided for the realization of dues, and parties were allowed to pursue their rights through ongoing civil suits as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>