<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 500 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand, ruling in favor of the appellant, as the Revenue could not prove the need for invoking the extended limitation period. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 500 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand, ruling in favor of the appellant, as the Revenue could not prove the need for invoking the extended limitation period. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>