https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287549 The High Court of Madras allowed all Writ Petitions challenging assessment orders under the CST Act for the years 2011-12 to 2014-15, citing a violation of principles of natural justice. The court found that the petitioner was not afforded adequate opportunity to present their case, rendering the orders legally flawed. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted 15 days to submit objections and supporting documents, with a directive for a personal hearing and reassessment in compliance with the law. The court also ordered reassessment under the TNVAT Act, with no costs imposed. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:49:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287549 The High Court of Madras allowed all Writ Petitions challenging assessment orders under the CST Act for the years 2011-12 to 2014-15, citing a violation of principles of natural justice. The court found that the petitioner was not afforded adequate opportunity to present their case, rendering the orders legally flawed. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh consideration. The petitioner was granted 15 days to submit objections and supporting documents, with a directive for a personal hearing and reassessment in compliance with the law. The court also ordered reassessment under the TNVAT Act, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287549