https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287539 The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court judgment, holding the certificate communication to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate was effectively made and the complainant failed to appeal within 60 days, thereby losing that right. The Court found the High Court erred in construing Section 3 of the Assam Repealing Act as depriving rights; Section 3 concerns transfer of cases and did not extinguish accrued rights of the accused. Consequently the impugned order granting the certificate stands. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287539 The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court judgment, holding the certificate communication to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate was effectively made and the complainant failed to appeal within 60 days, thereby losing that right. The Court found the High Court erred in construing Section 3 of the Assam Repealing Act as depriving rights; Section 3 concerns transfer of cases and did not extinguish accrued rights of the accused. Consequently the impugned order granting the certificate stands. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287539