https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394589 The court directed the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Commissioner, CGST, with an upfront amount of Rs. 30.00 lakh. The Commissioner was to review the request for revocation of the cancellation order within ten days and keep the cancellation order in abeyance until a decision was made. The court ordered the restoration of the petitioner's GST registration post lockdown, ensuring reinstatement once the nationwide lockdown was lifted. The judgment outlined a pathway for the petitioner to address the cancellation by following procedures in Section 80 of the CGST Act and emphasized timely payment and compliance with tax regulations. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394589 The court directed the petitioner to make a fresh representation to the Commissioner, CGST, with an upfront amount of Rs. 30.00 lakh. The Commissioner was to review the request for revocation of the cancellation order within ten days and keep the cancellation order in abeyance until a decision was made. The court ordered the restoration of the petitioner's GST registration post lockdown, ensuring reinstatement once the nationwide lockdown was lifted. The judgment outlined a pathway for the petitioner to address the cancellation by following procedures in Section 80 of the CGST Act and emphasized timely payment and compliance with tax regulations. Case-Laws GST Wed, 25 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394589