<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 485 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271D for receiving cash loans in violation of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal. The decision highlighted the necessity of adhering to legal requirements and rejected ignorance of the law as a defense for non-compliance with tax regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 485 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271D for receiving cash loans in violation of section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the appeal. The decision highlighted the necessity of adhering to legal requirements and rejected ignorance of the law as a defense for non-compliance with tax regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>