<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 482 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest expenses amounting to Rs. 12 lakhs due to funds diversion for land purchase by the firm. The decision aligned with the proviso to section 36(1)(iii) of the IT Act, requiring assets to be utilized for business to claim interest deductions. The appeal was dismissed, citing the necessity of asset utilization for business purposes based on a similar ruling for AY 2008-09.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:06:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 482 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of interest expenses amounting to Rs. 12 lakhs due to funds diversion for land purchase by the firm. The decision aligned with the proviso to section 36(1)(iii) of the IT Act, requiring assets to be utilized for business to claim interest deductions. The appeal was dismissed, citing the necessity of asset utilization for business purposes based on a similar ruling for AY 2008-09.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>