<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 481 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh examination by the AO on the disallowance of deduction u/s 80JJA, disallowance made u/s 14A, and provision for mark to market loss on derivatives. The Tribunal found flaws in the AO&#039;s reasoning and directed a reevaluation, emphasizing the importance of valuing relevant items for deduction eligibility. The judgment was pronounced on February 6, 2020, by ITAT Bangalore.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:06:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 481 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh examination by the AO on the disallowance of deduction u/s 80JJA, disallowance made u/s 14A, and provision for mark to market loss on derivatives. The Tribunal found flaws in the AO&#039;s reasoning and directed a reevaluation, emphasizing the importance of valuing relevant items for deduction eligibility. The judgment was pronounced on February 6, 2020, by ITAT Bangalore.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>