<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 477 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394570</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal filed by the assessee regarding the computation of tax under section 115JB and MAT credit under section 115JAA. The decision emphasized the correct calculation method for MAT credit, aligning with previous judgments and the CBDT&#039;s prescribed format for tax calculations. The ITAT highlighted the importance of including surcharge in the tax liability computation for MAT credit purposes, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 477 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394570</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal filed by the assessee regarding the computation of tax under section 115JB and MAT credit under section 115JAA. The decision emphasized the correct calculation method for MAT credit, aligning with previous judgments and the CBDT&#039;s prescribed format for tax calculations. The ITAT highlighted the importance of including surcharge in the tax liability computation for MAT credit purposes, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>