<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Respondent&#039;s entitlement to deduct discounts known at the time of clearance but quantified later, citing legal precedents and circulars. The rejection of the provisional assessment request was overturned, aligning with legal provisions. Both issues were decided in favor of the Respondent, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Respondent&#039;s entitlement to deduct discounts known at the time of clearance but quantified later, citing legal precedents and circulars. The rejection of the provisional assessment request was overturned, aligning with legal provisions. Both issues were decided in favor of the Respondent, rejecting the Department&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>