<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1378 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287522</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order under section 263, quashed the CIT&#039;s directive, and restored the original assessment order. The addition of Rs. 1,48,74,860/- was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal concluded that the AO had applied his mind and conducted a proper inquiry, and the mere fall in GP/NP rates did not warrant an addition or revision under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:58:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1378 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287522</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order under section 263, quashed the CIT&#039;s directive, and restored the original assessment order. The addition of Rs. 1,48,74,860/- was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed. The Tribunal concluded that the AO had applied his mind and conducted a proper inquiry, and the mere fall in GP/NP rates did not warrant an addition or revision under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>