https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287533 The court held that the absence of Inter-Commissionerate Transfer (ICT) provisions in the 2016 Recruitment Rules rendered ICT orders post-2016 invalid. It emphasized that statutory rules prevail over executive orders, affirming that the 2016 Rules did not allow for ICT. The court validated the cancellation of ICT orders, maintaining separate cadres as per the 2016 Rules. Judicial review of administrative decisions on ICT was limited to mala fide actions or statutory violations. The original petitions were allowed, supporting the administrative decisions and policy against ICT. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:58:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287533 The court held that the absence of Inter-Commissionerate Transfer (ICT) provisions in the 2016 Recruitment Rules rendered ICT orders post-2016 invalid. It emphasized that statutory rules prevail over executive orders, affirming that the 2016 Rules did not allow for ICT. The court validated the cancellation of ICT orders, maintaining separate cadres as per the 2016 Rules. Judicial review of administrative decisions on ICT was limited to mala fide actions or statutory violations. The original petitions were allowed, supporting the administrative decisions and policy against ICT. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287533