https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287516 An admission of guilt made only after the close of prosecution evidence and after examination under Section 313 could not be used to determine guilt. Because the court's appreciation of evidence was influenced by that post-evidence admission, the conviction was vitiated and could not safely stand. The enhanced sentence, being consequential to the conviction, also fell once the conviction was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal from the appropriate stage, without being influenced by the admission. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287516 An admission of guilt made only after the close of prosecution evidence and after examination under Section 313 could not be used to determine guilt. Because the court's appreciation of evidence was influenced by that post-evidence admission, the conviction was vitiated and could not safely stand. The enhanced sentence, being consequential to the conviction, also fell once the conviction was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh disposal from the appropriate stage, without being influenced by the admission. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287516