<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 330 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287509</link>
    <description>A temporary appointee who is later regularised as a local candidate cannot claim seniority from the date of the initial temporary appointment where the appointment was expressly pending further orders and the service records support that status. The Court noted that the posts claimed were not shown to be the same as the transferred permanent posts, which carried a different and higher pay structure and were protected under the reorganisation arrangements. The appellant&#039;s post had been treated as a different category outside the cadre, and the continued use of the old nomenclature did not alter its character. Seniority was therefore countable only from regularisation, not from the temporary entry date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=610433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 330 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287509</link>
      <description>A temporary appointee who is later regularised as a local candidate cannot claim seniority from the date of the initial temporary appointment where the appointment was expressly pending further orders and the service records support that status. The Court noted that the posts claimed were not shown to be the same as the transferred permanent posts, which carried a different and higher pay structure and were protected under the reorganisation arrangements. The appellant&#039;s post had been treated as a different category outside the cadre, and the continued use of the old nomenclature did not alter its character. Seniority was therefore countable only from regularisation, not from the temporary entry date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>