https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287506 A police inspector could not be posted to the Civil Defence Organisation outside the police cadre without consent, because deputation to another department is not unilateral and must fit the governing service scheme. The court treated the Civil Defence Organisation as a separate body with distinct functions, and held that a general rule allowing employment "in any manner" could not be read to authorise placement outside the parent department in a way that would conflict with equality and fair treatment in public service. The Civil Defence Act and regulations also indicated that only fit and willing persons could serve, and police personnel were not ordinarily eligible. The impugned posting and continuance of deputation were therefore illegal. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:51:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287506 A police inspector could not be posted to the Civil Defence Organisation outside the police cadre without consent, because deputation to another department is not unilateral and must fit the governing service scheme. The court treated the Civil Defence Organisation as a separate body with distinct functions, and held that a general rule allowing employment "in any manner" could not be read to authorise placement outside the parent department in a way that would conflict with equality and fair treatment in public service. The Civil Defence Act and regulations also indicated that only fit and willing persons could serve, and police personnel were not ordinarily eligible. The impugned posting and continuance of deputation were therefore illegal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287506